2019 (11) TMI 1264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t: Shri Varun Gaba, Advocate And Shri Anmol Gupta, CA Present for the Respondent: Shri A.K. Saini, AR ORDER PER: ASHOK JINDAL The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the refund claim has been rejected under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No.27/2012-ST dt.18.6.2012. 2. The facts of the case are not in dispute. The appellant has availe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Global Analytics India Pvt.Ltd. vide Final Order No.40942-40943/2019 dt.22.7.2010, the CESTAT bench of this Tribunal has allowed the refund claim. Therefore, refund claim be allowed to the appellant. 4. On the other hand, Ld.AR supported the impugned order. 3. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 4. I have gone through the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Global Ana....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Authority vide Orders-in-Original dated 28.03.2018 and 16.04.2018, after considering the explanation of the appellant, however, rejected the refund claims inter alia on the grounds that the assessee had not fulfilled the primary condition of debiting equal amount of CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 ibid at the time of filing refund claim and that since the appellant had carried forward in TRAN-1 under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ovision in the ACES system to debit the value of refund and also the fact that the entire credit which was carried forward in TRAN-1 stood reversed by the appellant voluntarily in its GSTR-3B filed for the month of April 2018. 7.2 The above facts, according to me, are sufficient compliances with the condition at paragraph 2(h) since post G.S.T., the scenario is different than the one prev....