2019 (11) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ry, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant, inter alia is engaged in the manufacture of pesticides. For manufacture of the said final product, CARTAP is used as a raw material, which was imported by the appellant in the month of May 2006 on payment of CVD and SAD. An amoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise had confirmed cenvat demand of Rs. 14,87,490/- along with interest and also imposed equal amount of penalty on the appellant. On appeal, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Mumbai-I vide the impugned order dated 03.06.2011 has upheld the adjudged demand confirmed on the appellant. Hence, the appellant has preferred this appeal before....