Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee against the order of the first appeal authority dated 12.7.2013. The first appeal authority had held 'crankshaft' and 'camshaft' used in the compressors in refrigerators are not machinery. However, with respect to rejection of books of accounts and best judgement assessment, the matter had been remitted to the assessing authority. The proceedings, thus remanded, have given rise to two separate revisions being Sales/Trade Tax Revision Nos. 298 of 2018 for A.Y. 2008-09 (U.P.) and 299 of 2018 for A.Y. 2008-09 (Central). Those revisions would be dealt with separately. 2. Heard Sri Rahul Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant-assessee and Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party-revenue. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and air-conditioners, which in turn are consumer goods or home appliances, and not machinery. To reach that conclusion, the Tribunal has reasoned that machineries are only such items as are used for production and manufacture of other goods. The Tribunal has relied on the definition of capital goods under Section 2(f) of the Act and observed,it includes machinery used for production and manufacture of goods. On such reasoning, the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. 6. The aforesaid reasoning appears to be wholly erroneous, inasmuch as, the Tribunal has completely misdirected itself in approach and thus, reached wholly unacceptable conclusions. 7. Entry no. 26 of Schedule-II Part-A reads as under: "26.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsporting goods or passengers or both; (v) capital goods used in the execution of a works contract; and [(vi) ................]^Omitted" 9. Section 4(1)(a) of the Act reads as under: "4. Levy of tax on turnover of sale.- (1) The tax, payable on sale of goods under this Act, shall be levied and paid on the taxable turnover of sale of- (a) goods named or described in column 2 of the Schedule II, at every point of sale and at the rate of four percent." 10. Thus, in the first place, Section 4(1)(a) read with Schedule-II of the Act provides for rate of tax on goods that have been described in column-2 Schedule-II. Thus, everything else apart, the rate of tax on goods falling under Schedule-II wo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....only when by a liberal construction the specific heading cannot cover the goods in question. The language of Entry 97(b) clearly shows, by use of the phrase "other than those specified elsewhere" that it is not only a residuary entry but also that electronic systems, instruments, etc. may be classified under other entries. Entry 90 on the other hand does not contain any words of limitation. The items mentioned therein would cover every species thereof irrespective of the mode of their operation. Cash registering machines are specifically mentioned. In the absence of any limitation or qualification as to the different kinds of cash registering machines, there is no reason to read in any such qualification and limit the entry to particular ki....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... any of the Schedules, hence there exists no occasion to examine that issue any further or to determine whether there exists a special entry (of capital goods) and a general entry (of machinery) under entry no. 26, Schedule II, Part A. 14. No such exercise has been carried out by the Tribunal. In fact the Tribunal has got misdirected in forming its opinion on the reasoning, treating the goods to be non-capital goods and therefore not machinery. In that regard the Tribunal has not examined the true scope and ambit of entry 26 Schedule II, Part A, in correct light and it has further erred in relying on section 2(f) of the Act, which is not relevant to interpret the taxing entry, in absence of use of the words 'capital goods', under....