Timely Decisions in GST Registration Cancellation Appeals: Significance of Expedited ProcessRevocation of cancellation order - registration of the petitioner under the GST regime was cancelled - HELD THAT:- The present writ petition has become infructuous as the Competent Authority has since passed order dated 11.10.2019, whereby the application for revocation has been rejected - Appeal disposed of as infructuous.... ... ... Issues: Registration cancellation under GST regime, application for revocation under Section 30 of HGST Act, appealability under Section 107 of HGST Act.

Analysis:
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana heard a case involving the cancellation of registration under the GST regime. The petitioner had filed an application seeking revocation of the cancellation order under Section 30 of the HGST Act on 14.4.2019. However, as the application was not decided, the petitioner sought a direction to decide it early in the present writ petition.

During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the Competent Authority had passed an order on 11.10.2019, rejecting the application for revocation. The counsel further pointed out that the order is appealable under Section 107 of the HGST Act. Consequently, the court disposed of the case as infructuous, indicating that the matter had become irrelevant or unnecessary due to the Competent Authority's decision to reject the application for revocation.

This judgment highlights the importance of timely decisions on applications for revocation of registration cancellations under the GST regime. It also underscores the appealability of such decisions under Section 107 of the HGST Act, providing a legal recourse for aggrieved parties. The court's decision to dispose of the case as infructuous signifies the finality of the Competent Authority's rejection of the revocation application, emphasizing the need for parties to adhere to the statutory appeal process for further redressal. Revocation of cancellation order - registration of the petitioner under the GST regime was cancelled - HELD THAT:- The present writ petition has become infructuous as the Competent Authority has since passed order dated 11.10.2019, whereby the application for revocation has been rejected - Appeal disposed of as infructuous. M/s Way global India Limited Versus State of Haryana and others
GST
2019 (10) TMI 1180 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - HC
Dated:- 23-10-2019
CWP No. 23773 of 2019(O&M) - -
GST
Justice Jaswant Singh And Justice Lalit Batra, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Babbar, Advocate For The Respondent : Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana ORDER Jaswant Singh, J (Oral) The registration of the petitioner under the GST regime was cancelled vide order dated 14.12.2018. The petitioner filed an application on 14.4.2019 seeking revocation of the cancellation order under Section 30 of HGST Act. Since the same was not decided, a direction was sought to decide the same early in the present writ petition. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous as the Competent Authority has since passed order dated 11.10.2019, whereby the application for revocation has been rejected. It is further submitted that the order is appealable under Section 107 of HGST Act. Disposed of as infructuous.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders