Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2019 (10) TMI 519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IAR, J. For The Petitioners : ADVS. SRI. A. KUMAR, SRI. P. J. ANILKUMAR, SMT. G. MINI(1748), SRI. P. S. SREE PRASAD, SHRI. ABRAHAM JOB AND SRI. AJAY V. ANAND For The Respondents : SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT JUDGMENT The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P9 order passed by the 1st respondent, in a stay application filed along with an appeal against an order ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... find that Ext.P9 order is a laconic one bereft of any reasoning, and hence, cannot be legally sustained. I therefore quash Ext.P9 order, and direct the 1st respondent to pass fresh orders on the stay petition after hearing the petitioners. To enable the 1st respondent to do so, I direct the petitioners to appear before the 1st respondent, at his Office, at 11.00 a.m. on 14.11.2019. The 1st respon....

PrevPreviousNextNext