Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....idity of proceedings u/s. 147. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 24.08.2009 declaring total income of Rs. 5,49,980/-. Subsequently on the basis of information received from PCIT of the Income Tax (Investigation), Ahemdabad that the assessee had availed contrived loss of Rs. 4,39,342/- through broker by changing the client codes in sale and purchase orders of securities, the case of the assessee was reopened u/s. 147 after recording reasons. In response to notice u/s. 148 the assessee submitted that the original return filed may be treated as return filed in response to notice u/s. 148. The Assessing Officer, during the course of assessment proceedings, concluded that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., not having jurisdiction over the assessee, cannot issue notice u/s. 148 of the IT Act. The Assessing Officer in the instant case has not applied his mind and initiated action u/s. 147 on the basis of report of the investigation wing Therefore, the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer is not sustainable. 6. So far as the merit of the case is concerned, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. PAT Commodity Services Private Limited reported in (2019) 2 TMI 720 submitted that the Hon'ble High court has decided the issue in favour of the assessee and the appeal filed by the revenue has been dismissed. He accordingly submitted that both legally and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... IT Act, 1961. 9.1 The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. N. C. Cables Ltd. (supra) has held as under :- "11. Section 151 of the Act clearly stipulates that the CIT(A), who is the competent authority to authorize the reassessment notice, has to apply his mind and form an opinion. The mere appending of the expression 'approved' says nothing. It is not as if the CIT (A) has to record elaborate reasons for agreeing with the noting put up. At the same time, satisfaction has to be recorded of the given case which can be reflected in the briefest possible manner. In the present case, the exercise appears to have been ritualistic and formal rather than meaningful, which is the rationale for the safeguard of an app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted warranting reconsideration. 9- As far as explanation to Section 151, brought into force by Finance Act, 2008 is concerned, the same only pertains to issuance of notice and not with regard to the manner of recording satisfaction. That being so, the said amended provision does not help the revenue. 10- In view of the concurrent findings recorded by the learned appellate authorities and the law laid down in the case of Arjun Singh (supra), we see no question of law involved in the matter, warranting reconsideration. 11- The appeals are, therefore, dismissed." 9.3 Since in the instant case also both the approving authorities have given the approval in a mechanical manner, therefore, in the light of the ratio la....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is often misused by the assessee to pass on losses to the investors, who may have sizable profit arising out of commodity trading against which such losses can be set off. The Revenue normally points out number of such instances of client code modifications as well as nature of errors in filling of the client code. At any rate, what can be taxed in the hands of the present assessee is the income escaping assessment. Even if the Revenue's theory of the assessee having enabled the clients to claim contrived losses, the Revenue had to bring on record some evidence of the income earned by the assessee in the process, be it in the nature of commission or otherwise. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has added the entire amount of dou....