Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (11) TMI 41

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re two connected applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), filed at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Allahabad. Income-tax Application No. 272 of 1991 is in respect of the assessment year 1968-69 in which the following three questions have been proposed : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etting up of plant and machinery was revenue expenditure ?" The other application, i.e., Income-tax Application No. 273 of 1991, is in respect of the assessment year 1969-70 in which the following two questions have been proposed: "(I) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that in reassessment proceedings the Assessing Officer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erns the assessment year 1968-69 only. The figure of Rs. 1,93,581 referred in the question is an aggregate amount of four items alleged to have been incurred in carrying on the business. The case of the Revenue was that the amount represented by the expenditure in question was inadmissible, for the expenditure was of capital nature, whereas the case of the assessee was that it was revenue expendit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titions. Both the petitions were allowed in part. This court took the view that in respect of some items the action for reassessment was bad as it was based on a change of opinion, while in respect of others, the notices were valid and the Department was permitted to continue the reassessment proceedings in respect of which the notices were held valid. During the course of assessment proceedings, ....