2019 (9) TMI 790

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Kumar For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has sought a mandamus directing the 3rd respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise to refund the amount as per appellate order of the 2nd respondent dated 31.10.2012 within a time frame to be fixed by the Court. 2.The petitioner appears to have advanced several requests to the authorities seeking a refun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(in short 'CESTAT'), by order dated 15.01.2010 remanded the matter to the original authority for decision afresh. 4. The assessing authority once again rejected the refund claim, as against which an appeal was filed which was allowed by the 1st appellate authority by order dated 31.10.2012 stating categorically that the refund is not hit by the principle of unjust enrichment. This order h....