2017 (10) TMI 1483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Bimal Jain, Advocate for the Appellants Shri G R Singh, AR for the Respondent JUDGMENT Anil Choudhary: The issue in this appeal is whether the appellant engaged in manufacture of aerated water, fruit juice and fruit pulp based drinks falling under chapter heading number 22 of first schedule to Central Excise Tariff are entitled to Cenvat credit with respect to outdoor catering....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e was adjudicated on contest vide Order in Appeal dated 27.5.2015 wherein he relying on the rulings of this Tribunal in appellant's own case reported at 2014 - TIOL-2460- CESTAT-Mumbai, the Assistant Commissioner was pleased to drop the show cause notice. 3. Being aggrieved, the Revenue preferred appeal before the learned Commissioner (Appeals) who vide the impugned order in appeal after ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the impugned order is bad, based upon wrong/incomplete understanding of definition of input services and suggested to be set aside. The appellant assessee have rightly availed the Cenvat credit on the outdoor catering service which have been used for running its canteen inside the factory. Such canteen facility is available to all the employees in general and it is not meant for any specific empl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[2016 (41) STR 508 - Tri- Mum)] Accordingly, he prays for allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. 5. The learned AR for revenue have relied on the impugned order. 6. Having considered the contentions, I find that the learned Commissioner have misdirected himself by reading the word 'employees' instead of the word 'employee' in the exclusion clause C, thus the impugned order is er....