2019 (9) TMI 634

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd appeal. Notices on this application were issued. Pursuant to the notices issued, the non applicants appeared and filed their reply, opposing the application for condonation of delay. 2. I have heard Mr. Motwani, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Gupte, learned counsel for the non applicants. 3. At the outset, it is to be mentioned that the delay is of 20 years. This delay is huge one.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the applicant did not inform the outcome of the litigation to her. 4. This submission, at the first blush, appears very attractive and tends the Court to interfere with the matter. However, after hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, especially when a query was put to the learned counsel in respect of the conduct on the part of the applicant as to whether at any point of time, she on he....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the applicant even remotely tried to contact her advocate to know the fate of litigation. 6. In the application, it is stated that she entrusted her matter to Mr. Vilas Mate, of Tumsar. She never met with Mr. Bhole, Advocate. According to the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Bhole might, on instructions from Mr.Vilas Mate, have appeared before the Court below. 7. It is very easy for a liti....