2019 (9) TMI 469

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L) AND HON'BLE MR. P. DINESHA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri. N. Venkataraman, Advocate for the Appellant Shri. K. Veerabhadra Reddy, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: P. DINESHA By this miscellaneous application, the applicant is seeking the recalling of the Final Order No.40440/2018, dated 22.02.2018 passed by this Bench on the ground that the said order suffers fro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....01.08.2002 the legal services rendered to Dishnet, which was for a period of four years; that in support, an order by Delhi Bench of the CESTAT was also referred to which is also not at all considered by this Bench, that therefore, the demand, if any, could never be confirmed at least for the prior period January, 2000 to August, 2002; that the appellant had furnished documents in support of his l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate and referring to the impugned order of this Bench, contended that this Bench has passed the impugned final order after hearing both sides and after perusing the appeal records. There is no error apparent on the record and, therefore, no intervention is required. He also contended that interfering with the impugned final order would amount to review, which is not permissible under law. 4. W....