Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (12) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wing question of law : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who allowed depreciation on truck at the rate of 40 per cent. as against 30 per cent. allowed by the Income-tax Officer?" The assessee is an individual carrying on business in explosives. He claimed depreciation at the rate of 40 per cent. in respect of his vehicles. The Income-tax Officer allowed depreciation only at the rate of 30 per cent., as according to the Income-tax Officer, the vehicles were used in his own business and he was not carrying on the business of transportation. An appeal was filed by the assessee which was allowed by the Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e two references should be decided in favour of the Revenue and it should be held that depreciation on truck is permissible only at the rate of 30 per cent. as allowed by the Income-tax Officer. As against this, Shri Ranka, counsel for the assessee, has submitted that the facts of this case are not disputed and it has been clearly held that the vehicle is also being hired by the assessee. It is submitted that in these circumstances the assessee is entitled to depreciation at the rate of 40 per cent. Reliance has been placed on Karnani Properties Ltd. v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 547 (SC) and Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 11 (SC). It is submitted that there is no question of law involved so that the references should be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and held as under: "A plain reading of both these entries, i.e., entry No. III(ii)D(9) and III(ii)E(1A) given in Part I of Appendix I, appended to the Rules, shows that if the motor buses, motor lorries and motor taxis are used in the business of running them on hire, then those motor vehicles are covered under entry No. III(ii)E(1A) of Appendix I and are entitled to depreciation at 40 per cent. and the motor buses and motor lorries other than those used in the business of running them on hire are entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent. It is true that the relevant clause does not lay down the requirement of hiring wholly or exclusively, but the entry has maintained the distinction about the entitlement to depreciation at 40 per cent. a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ompany. Thus, the broad proposition is that the assessee has to show that the vehicle has been used for purposes of transportation business on hire by others rather than using the vehicle only for the business of the company. Thus, it has to be seen in the facts and circumstances of each case whether the Tribunal has considered the facts and circumstances of the case according to the evidence available on record. When the question referred to the High Court or sought to be referred to the High Court speaks of, "on the facts and in the circumstances of the case", it means on the facts and circumstances found by the Tribunal and not the facts and circumstances as may be found by the High Court on a reappraisal of the evidence. Their Lordships....