2017 (3) TMI 1770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Amit Jain, Advocate For the Respondent : Sh. Yogesh Agarwal, AR ORDER Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against the order-in-original No. JAI-EXCUS/002-COM-065-13-14 dated 17.09.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration (April 2007 to august 2009), the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appellant and Sh. Yogesh Agarwal, ld. AR for the Revenue. 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of record, it appears that the period of dispute under consideration the appellant has also asked other manufacturer to do the manufacturing activity. During the course of arguments, ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the job worker was the independent entity and duty for the goods....