Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cree holder seeks execution of a foreign award dated 17.11.2014. 2. The record shows that the judgment debtor had filed objections under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short "1996 Act"). This court dismissed the objections vide judgment dated 03.07.2017. 3. The judgment debtor had carried the matter in appeal right up to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, vide order dated 23.08.2017 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20759-20761/2017 (SLP), dismissed the SLP. Consequently, the judgment of this court dated 03.07.2017 stands sustained. 4. The record also shows that pursuant to the order passed by this court dated 25.08.2017, the judgment debtor deposited the entire decretal amount along with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he discussion above, the balance amount was kept back to ascertain the view of the Income Tax Department as to whether the decree holder could be called upon to pay withholding tax. 5. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate, who appears on behalf of the income tax department, has adverted to the affidavit of Dr. Prabha Kant, Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) - 1. To be noted, the copy of the affidavit handed over to me in Court is undated and does not bear the signatures of Dr. Prabha Kant i.e. the Deponent. On being queried, Mr. Sharma states that the contents of the affidavit handed over in Court are identical to the original affidavit which is signed by Dr. Prabha Kant i.e. the Deponent, though, inadvertently not filed. 5.1. M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the exceptions of Article 22(3) is to be determined by the Assessing officer in detailed assessment under the IT Act. At this stage, it would be fair to deduct tax @ 42.024% on the award income under the provisions of the Act. Cost of Arbitration proceedings USD 80,440 This portion of the award is in lieu of expenses incurred by Glencore International on a number of items which mainly include costs incurred on engaging professional experts like lawyers etc. for the purposes of arbitration.  Therefore, Glencore has incurred these expenses for availing services which are prima-facie technical/consultancy services which are taxable as "Fee for Technical services" under the provisions of Income Tax Act as well as DTAA. The p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the income tax department is that compensation received by the decree holder towards breach of contract is liable for taxation in India as it is a "windfall gain" and hence is covered under Article 22(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ("DTAA") subsisting between India and Switzerland. 8. Mr. Ajit Sharma, says that there is no dispute that the decree holder does not have a permanent establishment in India. The objection according to Mr. Sharma qua this aspect veers around Article 22(3) of the DTAA. The said article reads as follows: "Article 22 Other Income 1. xxx    xxx    xxx 2. xxx    xxx    xxx 3. Notwithstanding the provisions ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions of Income Tax Act, 1962 (in short "1962 Act") and the DTAA. 13. Clearly, nothing can be further from reality. Therefore, the stand taken by the income tax department on this score would also have to be rejected. 14. This brings me to the last aspect which relates to the interest. 14.1 Mr. Ajit Sharma, says that the taxability qua interest would also be the subject matter of Article 22(3) of the DTAA. In my opinion, this stand is plainly wrong. The language of Article 22(3) of the DTAA does not support the stand of the income tax department. 15. I must, however, indicate that Mr. Sharma has submitted that the assertions made in Dr. Prabha Kant's affidavit conveys only a prima facie view of the matter and that a final view c....