2019 (8) TMI 1186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....BEEVI, C.S., MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And MR. P.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, MEMBER(TECHNICAL) Shri Ms.Marry Jossy, Advocate For the Appellant Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) For the Respondent ORDER PER : P.VENKATA SUBBA RAO Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. Both these appeals are for the subsequent period in a matter already decided by this Bench in Appeal Nos.ST/26 and 44/2012 v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment. On these issues the findings of this Bench for the previous period in Final Order Nos.42320-42321/2018 dated 29.08.2018 were as follows : "6. The first issue is with regard to the allegation that the appellant has paid the service tax only on the civil construction part of the contract and that has artificially bifurcated the turnkey project into three separate contracts. It is very....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....types of contracts taken together form a turnkey project and has proceeded to deny abatement on the civil works portion by observing that the tax payer cannot pay full rate on one portion and avail abatement on the other portion. But, it is seen that the Revenue has made no attempt to combine the three contracts into one mega turnkey project. No attempt has been made to assess such a composite con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under Sl.No. 7 of the Notification ibid. The adjudicating authority was in error by blindly sticking on the classification under 65 (105) (zzd) as declared by the appellant in their ST-3 returns." Following the same, we are of the view that the said allegation or the demand on this count cannot sustain and requires to be set aside, which we hereby do. 6.1 The second allegation is....