Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1994 (3) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....J.-The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench "B", has referred for the opinion of this court, the following questions under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case having regard to the corporate nature of the assessee the entire expenditure of Rs. 25,159 for the assessment year 1974-75 and Rs. 26,079 for the assessment ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the year 1975-76. The Income-tax Officer allowed only a sum of Rs. 9,500 for the assessment year 1974-75 and a sum of Rs. 3,000 for the assessment year 1975-76 as deduction. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed an estimated deduction equivalent to 20 per cent. of the interest income derived by the company as a deduction under section 57(iii) of the Act in computing the net interest incom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....find no valid reason for taking a different view of the matter on this aspect and hence, we answer question No. 1 referred to us in the negative against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. Question No. 2: The assessee had claimed set off of unabsorbed depreciation to the extent of the income available under the head "Interest", which claim was rejected by the Income-tax Officer. The C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....extile Industries Ltd. [1987] 168 ITR 773, the Division Bench of this High Court, speaking through Justice B. S. Kapadia, held categorically that (headnote): "On reading section 32(2) of the Act, it is clear that the purpose of the Legislature in introducing the legal fiction is to give the benefit of the unabsorbed depreciation in the following previous year or in the succeeding previous years....