Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1066

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax<br>MR AJAY TEWARI AND MR AVNEESH JHINGAN, JJ. For The Applicant-Appellant : Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocate For The Revenue : Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate ORDER AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of above mentioned two review applications. Since common questions of law and facts are involved....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me into existence after 7.1.2003 by stating that initial assessment year can't be re-fixed? iv) Whether the ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law and facts in holding that definition of initial assessment year does not allow the undertaking to claim deduction under Section 80IC at the rate of 100% upon their substantial expansion?" The present application has been filed by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re is no quarrel with this proposition of law in the abstract but in the present case what has emerged is that the original judgment of this Court (decided on 06.09.2018) was based on the decision of the Supreme Court in M/s Classic Binding Industries (supra). However, in the subsequent decision in M/s AARHAM Softronics (supra) the Supreme Court specifically noticed that in M/s Classic Binding Ind....