2019 (8) TMI 168
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dent Through: Mr. J.K. Singh with Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Avesh Chaudhary, Advocates. O R D E R 1. These are Revenue's appeals against the common impugned order dated 16th May 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA Nos.843/DEL/2010 (Assessment Year 'AY' 2006-07), 2169/DEL/2011 (AY 2007-08), ITA No.2431/DEL/2011 (AY 2007-08) and ITA No.1470/DEL/2013 (AY 2008-09) ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mmissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Sakal Relief Fund (2017) 81 taxman.com 396 (Bom) 4. On the facts of the present case, although the Assessee did not give the intimation at the time of filing the original returns, admittedly, the intimation was enclosed with the revised return filed by the Assessee. The Court accordingly does not find any error having been committed by the ITAT in holding t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as noticed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ['CIT (A)'] in his order dated 28th February 2011 for AY 2007-08. Consequently, the Court declines to frame any question on this issue. 7. The third issue which has been raised by the Revenue which is specific to AY 2008-09 is whether the ITAT was right in allowing depreciation in assets, the full cost of which was already allowed as appli....
TaxTMI