Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (2) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... price of stones as well as hire charges of trucks from the customers and thereby holding that the assessee is entitled to depreciation at 40 per cent. and not at 30 per cent. as is allowable in case of motor lorries ? " The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trader in stones and owned two trucks which are used for transportation of stones from the site of mines to the depot of the assessee as well as to the customers' premises. The claim of the assessee was that the trucks were occasionally used and when not in use by the assessee hired out to a sister concern. The income from hiring of the trucks in this manner was at a figure of Rs. 33,155. The value of the truck was shown at a figure of Rs. 3,82,280, and the expenditu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been shown. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that in accordance with the language used in (III)E(1A) of the depreciation table which uses the words " used in a business of running them on hire " means that the assessee must not only be giving the trucks on hire but also carrying on a business of running the trucks on hire. The fact which was also taken into consideration by the Commissioner of Income-tax was that this could be at the time only when there must be continuity or regularity on hiring transaction. Casual hiring to a sister concern is not sufficient to justify it that the assessee was carrying on the business of hiring as well, and, therefore, the depreciation at 30 per cent. was directed to be computed. In secon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....down the requirement of hiring wholly or exclusively, but the entry has maintained the distinction about the entitlement to depreciation at 40 per cent. and 30 per cent. In the case of motor buses and motor lorries other than those used in a business of running them on hire, they are entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent. while the motor buses, motor lorries and motor taxis used in a business of running them on hire are entitled to depreciation at 40 per cent. If a truck is not used for hiring but for the purpose of one's own business, then it would be entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent. and not 40 per cent. The context of the relevant entry does indicate the same. In the present case, the business of the assessee is that of minin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and as such the assessee is entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent. and not at 40 per cent. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal was not right in holding that the assessee is entitled to depreciation at 40 per cent. and not at 30 per cent. on the trucks and dumpers used by it for its business. " The rate of depreciation which is provided in respect of motor lorries other than those in a business of running them on hire is 30 per cent. If the motor buses, motor lorries and motor taxis are used in a business of running them on hire, then the depreciation is allowable at 40 per cent. in accordance with law. The finding which has been recorded by the Tribunal is that there is no specific mention in respect of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ck on hire by a person which is considered different business for which the rate of depreciation has been separately provided. The view this court has taken in the case of CIT v. Manjeet Stone Co. [1991] 190 ITR 183, referred to above that the trucks were mainly used by the assessee for carrying stones from the mine site to the sales depot and, therefore, he should be entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent. is undisputed in the facts of the present case also. In the statement of case, the assessee has been mentioned as a trader of stones using two trucks for transportation of stones from the mine site to the depot of the assessee as well as to the destination of the customers. It has nowhere come on record that the assessee was carrying....