Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 1239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....des, main writ petitions itself are taken up, heard out and are being disposed of. 3.It is not necessary to set out factual matrix in great detail as it is submitted by both learned counsel without any disputation or disagreement that the instant writ petitions are covered by an earlier order of this Court being order dated 20.06.2019 made in W.P.No.16242 of 2019. 4.Short facts shorn of elaboration are to the effect that writ petitioner is a dealer under 'Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (Tamil Nadu Act 32 of 2006)', hereinafter 'TNVAT Act' for brevity, writ petitioner is a trader in automobile spares and writ petitioner had purchased goods from local registered dealers, who are registered http://www.judis.nic.in u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....968/- and paid the tax of Rs. 1,01,835/- for the assessment year 2015-16, which is ascertained from the inter-net website certain purchases details taken from other dealer Annexure-II, for the year 2015-16. The dealer had not reported enure purchases in their monthly returns. The purchase omissions noticed as below.' 6. Thereafter taking this Court through the earlier order dated 13.06.2017 and the impugned order dated 07.06.2018, learned counsel also pointed out that first page in the aforesaid two orders are virtually adverbatim the same. 7. Responding to the above, learned State Counsel, who shall also be referred to as Revenue Counsel, very fairly submits that no writ appeal i.e., intra Court appeal has been prefer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in their web portal, there should be an exercise carried out by the department within its level before calling upon the dealer to show cause. This can be achieved only if there is a centralised mechanism and if the present practice is allowed to prevail, it would only result in multiplicity of proceedings with more number of cases pending before the Courts and Appellate forums, thus jeopardizing the interest of revenue. Therefore, it is high time the Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in consultation with him officers lays out a detailed procedure as to how to take forward cases of mismatch, evolve a central mechanism, which can go into these aspect and furnish details in full form to the respective Assessing ....