Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 944

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DI, JJ. For The Appellant : ADVS. SRI. HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT. MEERA V. MENON AND SMT. K. KRISHNA For The Respondents : SR GP. SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ JUDGMENT C. K. ABDUL REHIM, J. The appellant is the petitioner in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No.16894 of 2019. The writ petition was dismissed by leaving liberty to the appellant to approach the appellate authority. This appeal is file....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts and that no third party interest would be created upon the vehicle. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent passed Ext.P6 order imposing tax and penalty under sub-section (3) of Section 129. Challenge against the said order was declined through the judgment impugned, discernibly because of the fact that an effective alternative remedy is available against the said order. 3. The detention was on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he new vehicle which was transported had carried with it a temporary registration number and that the appellant could have used the said number for filing details while generating the e-way bill. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that, the specific question raised was not answered by the 2nd respondent while issuing the impugned order. Further, he had drawn our attention to an obse....