Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (7) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....PADIA J. ---- The petitioner was engaged in production of cinema feature films. The petitioner filed returns of losses in respect of the assessment years 1977-78 up to 1982-83. Pursuant to the said returns filed by the petitioner, in respect of the previous year ending on June 30, 1981, for the assessment year 1982-83, the Income-tax Officer, after considering the said return, passed an order on M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eceived on February 26, 1983. The petitioner filed his loss return for the assessment year 1981-82 on February 15, 1984, i.e., within the time prescribed under section 139(4). Against the income of Rs. 2,91,645 in respect of the assessment year 1982-83, the petitioner claims, inter alia, determination of the petitioner's losses for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 after hearing the petitio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tuted proceedings under section 147 in the meanwhile. In the present case, we have seen from the record that the petitioner filed returns indicating losses well within the time prescribed under section 139(4). It is contended on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner filed his returns under section 139(4) after issuance of notice under section 148 and in the circumstances, the petitioner wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Assistant Commissioner which was dismissed. The petitioner did not pursue the matter further. The petitioner did not prefer further appeal which was available to him in law and, therefore, the order of the Income-tax Officer has attained finality in respect of the assessment year 1979-80. In the circumstances, it is not possible to disturb the order passed by the Income-tax Officer in respect o....