2019 (7) TMI 512
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Present for the Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar, AR Rachna Gupta, None is present for the appellant. However, a written request for adjournment is on record. Perusal thereof shows that the application is a repeated effort for seeking adjournment. It is observed that the application as was filed on previous date i.e. 17.10.2018 only has been filed today with the correction / cutting, in hand, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rcumstances are sufficient for us to form an opinion that present appeal is nothing but a time gaining strategy of the appellant and that the appellant is not at all interested in pursuing this appeal. In addition, he is observed to have no regard for the directions of this Tribunal. We are therefore, of the firm opinion that this case deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution. We rely upon....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cause list 14.05.2019 4 M/S Mukesh Kumar Kumavat C/51159/2018 5 Shri Rahul Chauhan C/51160/2018 Custores, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal 13 MAY 2019 West Biche 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110068 The Hon'ble CESTAT Court No. Custom Division Bench R.K.Puram, New Delhi. Sub:- Request for adjournment of hearing fixed for 17.10.2018 Respected ....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI