2019 (7) TMI 497

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Accountant for the appellant. Shri P. Juneja, Authorised Representative for the respondent Anil Choudhary, The applicant, M/s. Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. (KMVNL) is a State Government Undertaking. Their appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed on limitation, as the same was filed at a delay of about 297 days from the date of receipt of the order-in-appeal dated 28.03.2013. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appeal on merits.. This Tribunal vide ex parte Final Order No.56046/2016 dated 20.12.2016, taking notice that the appellant is not represented and the appeal is listed for the past several dates, took up the matter for ex parte hearing and was pleased to dismiss the appeal, observing that there is no error in the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), in dismissing the appeal on l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Uttarakhand High Court vide Order dated 12.02.2013. 5. Heard the parties. 6. Having considered the rival contentions, I find that the order of the Hon'ble Uttarakhand High Court, appears to have either not been brought to the notice of the Commissioner (Appeals), or the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to take notice of the same, as it appears from the impugned order-inappeal. 7. Further, I f....