2019 (7) TMI 397

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Sham Walve and Ms. Maya Majumdar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal, for the Respondents. P.C: Not on board Mentioned. Upon mentioning taken on board for final disposal at the request of the parties. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order dated 31st December, 2018 passed by the Respondent No.1 Customs, Excise and Service Tax App....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned Chartered Accountant representing the respondent. On perusal of the application, we find no cogent and valid reason for staying release of refund ordered by first appellate authority. Accordingly, the application is rejected." 3. The above order is self evidently a nonspeaking order. It even does not record the basic dispute between the parties leading to the refund. Nor does it record the ....