Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (8) TMI 36

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder section 27, sub-section (3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), at the instance of the Revenue. The question referred for the opinion of this court is as follows : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the view of the Tribunal that the relevant date for purposes of imposition of penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fide intention because for the year 1965-66 and the subsequent years she filed returns voluntarily. The Wealth-tax Officer did not accept these submissions. and imposed a penalty of Rs. 17,486. The Wealth-tax Officer computed penalty for the period July 1, 1964, to March 31, 1969, under the provisions of law as in force before the date of amendment which was made from April 1, 1969, for the period....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this court for consideration in the case of CWT v. Smt. Brij Rani [1993] 201 ITR 307. In this case, this court was of the view that the penalty under section 18(1)(a)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for the delay in filing the returns for the assessment years in question is to be levied for the period of delay prior to April 1, 1969, in terms of the prescribed rates with reference to the unamended....