Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (1) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e following question has been referred under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act"), for the opinion of this court : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in modifying the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order directing the Wealth-tax Officer to follow certain decisions of the Special Bench of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sistant Commissioner who noted that the value of the assessee's interest in each of the two firms has to be determined in accordance with rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. He, therefore, set aside the order of the Wealthtax Officer and directed fresh assessment by the Wealth-tax Officer in accordance with law. Thereafter, the Revenue took up the matter before the Appellate Tribunal, who, after....