2019 (7) TMI 188
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... : ADVS. SRI. K. N. SREEKUMARAN, SRI. N. SANTHOSHKUMAR AND SRI. P. J. ANILKUMAR (A-1768) For The RESPONDENTS : SR. GP-SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ JUDGMENT Abdul Rehim, J The appellant herein is challenging the judgment in WP(C) No. 402/2019, dated 21.01.2019, through which the writ petition was dismissed. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Exts.P1 and P2 orders of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion. It is pointed out that the judgment in WP(C) No. 11335/2018 covers only the question of validity of Section 174. However, the learned counsel for the appellant had fairly conceded that the appellant is not intending to pursue the challenges with respect to Ext.P2 assessment finalised for the year 2012-13. It is contended that, with respect to Ext.P1 assessment with respect to the year 2011-1....