Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (10) TMI 34

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's finding that two assessments for the two different periods should be made in this case ?" There was a firm in the name and style of K. D. Punetha and Sons. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h of K. D. Punetha, one of the partners, two assessments should have been made for the two respective periods. Thereafter, the Revenue went in appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal. The question referred to this court was considered in the case of Dahi Laxmi Dal Factory v. ITO [1976] 103 ITR 517, by a Full Bench of this court where in it was held tha....