2007 (4) TMI 755
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s qua the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 976/1/2005 titled "Praveen Kumar Jain v. R.D. Sharma and Ors.," pending before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate. It is submitted by the petitioner that the case in question was filed by the respondent on the basis of dishonour of a cheque dated 2nd August, 2004 for a sum of Rs. 1 lac. The cheque was issued by Shri Ram Dev Sharma, respondent No. 2 in t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....company. He was the one who contacted the complainant for loan and was responsible for the business of the company. 3. A perusal of the complaint would show that complainant has not mentioned as to when the proprietorship firm was converted into a partnership firm and when it got converted into a company. Rather in the complaint, it is stated that the coaching business was being run by the accu....
TaxTMI