2019 (6) TMI 754
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pda Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC ORDER Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Mr.Pramodkumar Chopda, learned Senior Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents. To be noted, both the respondents are official respondents. 2. This writ petition is listed in the motion list under the caption 'FOR ADMISSION' today....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s now, this Court does not express any opinion on this plea of the writ petitioner. 5. A perusal of the impugned order made by the first respondent reveals that it is cryptic and it is made up of two sentences. However, what is of greater importance is vide the impugned order, the first respondent has rejected the refund plea of the writ petitioner qua said goods. The application for refund made ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the affirmative to the query (vide column 12 in the prescribed form) as to whether personal hearing is required. 7. Notwithstanding the aforesaid position, there is no mention about the personal hearing in the impugned order. There is nothing before this Court to demonstrate that an opportunity of personal hearing was afforded to the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for writ petitioner, on inst....