2019 (6) TMI 691
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ency) No. 562 of 2019 - -<br>Insolvency & Bankruptcy<br>Mr S. J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson And Mr A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial) And Mr Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) For The Appellants : Mr. Tushar Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Spandan Biswal, Ms. Srideepa Bhattacharya, Ms. Sylona Mohapatra and Ms. Surabhi Khattar, Advocates For The Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) (Insolvency) No.198 of 2018 remitted the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi for consideration of the 'Resolution Plan' submitted by 'JSW Steel' in accordance with law with certain observations and directions. Thereafter, the matter has been heard and judgment was reserved. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that in the mea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mit the matter for fresh decision as more than 270 days have been passed. 5. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appeared on behalf of the said Ravi Prakash Goyal and Mr. Sanjay Singal, erstwhile Directors and Promoters of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited to oppose the prayer. It is submitted that the Appeal under Section 61 is not maintainable in absence of any decision by the Adjudicating....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and has also supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. We are not expressing any opinion as to whether they have the supervisory jurisdiction over all the Tribunals or not, but it is not clear as to how the Punjab and Haryana High Court can pass an order, which has no territorial jurisdiction over Delhi, where Prin....