2019 (6) TMI 625

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant in both the Appeals. Mr. Prakash Shah with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. Mr. Durgaprasad Poojary, for the Respondent in both the Appeals. P.C: These two appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenge the order dated 12th December, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2. The common impugned order disposed of the two ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly relates to valuation of good and its appeal to this Court would not be maintainable in view of Section 35G of the said Act. This as the above Section 35G of the Act specifically excludes the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain Appeals, inter alia, on question having relates to valuation of goods. Thus, these appeals are not maintainable before this Court. 5. It is pertinent to note that ....