Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 1838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the above, the professional may inform the Hon'ble High Court that the NCLT is taking up the matter for hearing on 03.10.2018 for passing appropriate orders. The professional representing the petitioner may take up appropriate steps towards the same. List this matter on 03.10.2018 for further consideration. At 4.30 p.m. When the matter was taken up in the morning a direction was given to the petitioner to inform the Hon'ble High Court that this Tribunal would take up the matter on 03.10.2018. In view of the rejection of the Writ Petition by the Hon'ble High Court, this matter was heard in the afternoon on an urgent motion by the petitioner. Heard Shree Mahesh A. Athavale, PCS. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt authorities for the de-empanelment. The petitioner was making his own efforts to safeguard the interest of the Company and his investments. While the matters stood thus, the Respondent No. 2 had issued notice on 6th September, 2018 for the inclusion of an Agenda item to the Annual General Meeting for the removal of petitioner as the Director of the Company. Subsequently, notice was issued to the members by the Respondent No. 3 proposing a resolution for the removal of the petitioner as the Director. The explanatory statement attached to the said notice, evidently does not contain any reasons, let alone tenable reasons, for the removal of the petitioner as the director of the Company. In exercise of his rights as substantial shareholder....