Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (6) TMI 77

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the disallowance of Rs. 6,36,979.33 made under section 40A(3) of the Act ? (2) Whether, under the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal did not err, in facts as well as in law, in impliedly holding that if the transactions are entered in the books of account of the payee then no disallowance is to be made under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act ?" The respondent is an assessee under the Act. During the course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee made entries of cash payment exceeding Rs. 2,500 in violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer, therefore, asked the assessee to explain the reason for making such cash payment. The assessee coul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed verification as those letters were neither produced before the Assessing Officer nor before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Accordingly, the matter was sent to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) with a direction that if after verification, the contents of the letter particularly as to the entry in the books of account were found to be correct, he should grant necessary relief in respect of payment to those parties amounting to Rs. 1,26,111.65 after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties. However, the Tribunal disallowed a sum of Rs. 1,01,462. Thereafter, at the instance of the Revenue, the Tribunal referred the abovequoted questions for opinion of this court. We have heard Dr. A. K. Saraf, learned special co....