Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (10) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....estions for the opinion of this court for three assessment years, viz., 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1975-76 under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : " (1) Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is not entitled to a deduction of Rs. 18,677 or any part thereof representing pension payment to retired employees of the company in the computation of income for the assessment y....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the same assessee, this court in the decision reported in CIT v. T. Stanes and Co. Ltd. [1976] 105 ITR 251 held that such deduction is not possible. This decision of this court was confirmed by the Supreme Court in the decision reported in T. Stanes and Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1991] 188 ITR 237. In view of the abovesaid decision rendered in the case of the same assessee, we hold that the Tribunal was ....