2018 (7) TMI 1974

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al, Bharat Ji Agrawal, Piyush Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C. ORDER These revision petition nos. 676 of 2006 and 679 of 2006 are filed against the common judgment-order dated 21.03.2006 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal and since the controversy involved in both the revision petitions is one and the same therefore these revision petitions are decided by the common order. Hear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the aforesaid entry tax Act, 2007 as valid and the issue involved in the present revision petitions is also covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Supra). The learned counsel for the revisionists, in fact has fairly conceded that the matter is covered by the aforesaid judgment. In view thereof I am in the entire agreement that the view expressed by ....