2019 (5) TMI 1367
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Counsel for Sri. M.S. Nagaraja, Advocate Respondent: Sri. Vikram Huilgol, HCGP ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order of Prohibition dated 21.03.2019 at Annexure-A to the writ petition seeking directions to respondent Nos. 1 and2 to relate the detained goods forthwith along with exemplary damages and costs of litigation to the petitioner....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vance of the petitioner that respondent No. 2 violating the principles of natural justice issued the notice dated 21.03.2019 proposing to confiscate the goods and has simultaneously passed the prohibition order detaining the goods without affording an opportunity to file written reply and arbitrarily detaining the perishable goods belonging to third parties without there being any liability to mak....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the copy of the summons and submit the acknowledgment thereof. In the circumstances, the petitioner would be deprived of carrying his legitimate business in accordance with law, if the enquiry proceedings are spread over for a long time and the responsibility is fastened on the petitioner to served the copy of the summons on the unserved dealers of the persons. 6. Learned counsel for the respon....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... orders being passed, this Court is of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would sub-served in directing respondent No. 2 to conclude the enquiry relating to the goods in question in an expedite manner, in any event, not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and is ordered accordingly. This order is required to be passed keeping in mind that the ....