Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (3) TMI 111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by V. V. KAMAT J. --- With regard to the assessment year 1984-85, we are called upon to answer the following question : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,--- (i) the pension received by the assessee from the Government of Malaysia was not taxable in India ? (ii) the Tribunal is right in law and fact in relying on the notification dated April 1, 1977, and wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te authority (Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Trivandrum) dealt with the basic undisputed proposition that pension accruing abroad is taxable in India only if it is earned in India. On facts the appellate authority observed that pension received in India from abroad by pensioners residing in this country for past services rendered in the foreign country cannot be charged to tax in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. It is observed that the question as to whether the pension received by the assessee from abroad was taxable in India came up for decision before it in I.T.A. Nos. 550 and 551 for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81 in the case of one assessee, named, Shri N. Kochukrishna Pillai, to hold that it was not taxable. The Appellate Bench chose to follow the said decision on the observation that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is entirely different. However, in yet another decision of the same court in CIT v. A. P. Kalyanakrishnan [1992] 195 ITR 534, the position becomes abundantly clear. The matter also relates to an assessee who is a resident but not ordinarily resident in India and also a pensioner receiving pension from the Malaysian Government. It is held that the pension is received in Malaya by the assessee who ....