2016 (11) TMI 1618
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....For The Petitioner. Mr. Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel, Govt. of NCT of Delhi with Ms. Poonam, VAT(C) For The Respondent. ORDER We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks a direction for refund of the amount deposited together with interest. The respondent VAT Department (Commissioner of VAT) submits that although returns were filed for two quarters for the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....see, do not conform the Rule that was issued much later in the year 2012. What is more disturbing to this Court, however, is that all seven notices produced and relied upon by the Revenue demand "zero" from the assessee and assessed turnover at "zero". It is not only to the utter dismay of the Court but is entirely un-comprehensible and goes completely untenable. So called orders, copies of whi....
TaxTMI