2019 (5) TMI 1243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....osh Upadhyay, Advocate for the appellant Sh. K. Poddar, Authorised Representative for the respondent ORDER ANIL CHOUDHARY: Heard the parties. 2. The issue in this appeal is - (i) Whether the date of communication of the order-in-original has to be taken as 12 September, 2017, when the order was served on the security guard, as the factory was lying closed; and (ii)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tward freight as compared to balance sheet and that the differential duty was calculated as Rs. 6,725/- which was also paid by challan dated 18 June, 2015. Subsequently, show cause notice dated 26 May, 2016 was issued invoking the extended period of limitation for demand of interest and penalty. The show cause notice was adjudicated ex-parte by order-in-original dated 30 August, 2017. As the facto....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the city office, subsequently, on 25 November, 2017, is the effective date. Thus, the appeal was filed in time before the Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly, he states that even the show cause notice has been erroneously issued invoking the extended period of limitation. Admittedly, the appellant has deposited the tax/ duty as calculated by the Revenue. The appellant has not paid the interest. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and circumstances, it appears that the appellant also has neglected in making proper arrangement for receipt of their mail/dak. However, as the factory was lying closed, the notice was actually delivered to the management of the appellant only on 25 November, 2017 when the security guard delivered to the notice to the proper person, that can only considered as the effective date of service. The p....