2019 (5) TMI 1181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant Shri C. Mallikharjun Reddy, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S. 1. The above appeal has come up for hearing today on the defects noted by the Registry. The main defect noted by the Registry is that the appellant has not complied with mandatory pre-deposit as required under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, read with Section 83 of the Finance A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....9, dated 30.01.2019 in appeal No. ST/30309/2018 to support her contentions. 2. Ld. Departmental Representative Shri C. Mallikharjun Reddy argued the matter. 3. After hearing the submissions of both sides as well as perusal of records, it is seen that in the appellant's own case vide Miscellaneous Order No. M/30067-30068/2019 (cited supra), the Tribunal had followed the decision of Hon'ble Ju....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petitioner and that if the said amount is given credit to, the petitioner will not be liable to make any pre-deposit amount in the appeal. Mr. B. Narayana Reddy, learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 1 and 2, has, however, disputed the same. 2. In our opinion, the petitioner is entitled to be heard by respondent No.3 on the above mentioned aspects for as per its plea HUL Limited has alread....