2019 (5) TMI 1112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sues arise for consideration in both the appeals, we heard these appeals together and disposing the same by this common order. 2. The first issue arises for consideration is disallowance of Rs. 1,44,556/- under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. Shri N. Vijay Kumar, the Ld. representative for the assessee, submitted that the assessee met with an accident and suffering head injury for the last several years. According to the Ld. representative, the assessee is carrying out his business through sales commission agents for procuring orders and other business related activities. The assessee paid commission to various agents who rendered service for procuring orders, collection, etc. According to the L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to 50%. Moreover, it is not the case of the Revenue that Shri Navneet Bagdi has not rendered any service. In those circumstances, the CIT(Appeals) ought to have allowed the claim of the assessee in toto. Therefore, the order of the CIT(Appeals) in respect of commission payment to Shri Navneet Bagdi is modified and the Assessing Officer is directed to allow the entire payment of Rs. 2,89,112/-. 6. Now coming to the disallowance of Rs. 3,50,000/- under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act. 7. Shri N. Vijay Kumar, the Ld. representative for the assessee submitted that the assessee made donations to the institutions through banking channel. Therefore, according to the Ld. representative, the CIT(Appeals) is not justified in disallowing the donati....