2019 (5) TMI 831

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad Mookherjee with Mr. Rahul Sarkr, Advs. ORDER On being asked why this order dated 29th May, 2012 was challenged before thisLearned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that an adjudication order was passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) on 14th March, 2012 and dropped all the proceedings initiated by the Customs/Directorate of Revenue Intelligence in respect of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year 2019, the petitioners submit that several representations were made before the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade being the respondent no.2 in the instant application and the last of such representations was made on 2nd January, 2019, but not a single representation was considered by such respondent authority. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondent authority, submits that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 will give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, consider the submissions made by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in the light of the submission made by the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no.2 that there is no order of stay in respect of the order dated 14th March, 2012 and that the petitioners are suffering a deterrent action ....