2011 (12) TMI 721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Kumar, AGA for Respondent; JUDGMENT Ramesh, Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. 2. This writ petition is directed against the Notice dated 03.11.2011 (Annexure-A) issued by respondent No. 2 - the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk, K.R Puram, Bangalore, directing the petitioner to appear before him on 01.12.2011 3. Heard.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mber was directed to be entered in his name. Therefore, according to the Counsel, question of again appearing before the Special Tahsildar does not arise. He further submits that the notice does not even refer to the petitioner's khatha relating to his 20 guntas of land. 4. The question that requires to be determined in this writ petition is, whether the impugned notice is valid in law? ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate information of the case he has to meet. The adequacy of notice is a relative term and must be decided with reference to each case. The test of adequacy of notice will be whether it gives sufficient information so as to enable the person concerned to put up an effective defence. If a notice is vague or it contains unspecified or unintelligible allegations, it would imply a denial of proper oppo....