Rectification of Typographical Error in CESTAT Final OrderRectification of Mistake - typographical error - HELD THAT:- The error is rectified - application for rectification of mistake stands disposed of.... ... ... Issues Involved: Rectification of typographical error in a final order.

In the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD, the issue revolved around rectifying a typographical error in the Final Order No. A/30034/2019 dated 01.01.2019. The Revenue filed an application seeking rectification of the error. After hearing the learned D.R., it was found that there was indeed an error in the last sentence of paragraph No. 6 of the said order. The tribunal noted that the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed in the impugned order were unsustainable. Therefore, the last sentence of paragraph 6 was rectified to state that the impugned order required no interference. The application for rectification of the mistake was disposed of accordingly. The order was pronounced and dictated in open court by Mr. M.V. Ravindran. The judgment was delivered by Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Members of the tribunal. Rectification of Mistake - typographical error - HELD THAT:- The error is rectified - application for rectification of mistake stands disposed of. K. RAMABRAHMAM & SON PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX VISAKHAPATNAM-I
Service Tax
2019 (5) TMI 67 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI
CESTAT HYDERABAD - AT
Dated:- 22-3-2019
ST/ROM/30119/2019 in ST/701/2009-DB - M/30157/2019
Service Tax
Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, Member (Technical) None for the Appellant. Mr Guna Ranjan, A.R. for the Respondent. ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran. This application is filed by the Revenue seeking rectification of a typographical error in Final Order No. A/30034/2019 dated 01.01.2019. After hearing learned D.R. we find that there is an error in the last sentence of the paragraph No 6 of the said order dated 01.01.2019. The same needs rectification. The last sentence of the said paragraph 6 will read as under:- "Therefore, the demand of service tax along with interest and penalties imposed in the impugned order are unsustainable and the impugned order requires no interference." 2. The application for rectification of mistake stands disposed of as indicated hereinabove. (Order pronounced and dictated in open court)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders