Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 1669

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] - 1, Gurgaon dated 28.09.2018 pertaining to A.Y 2010-11. 2. The solitary grievance of the assessee is that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. 3. Roots for levy of penalty li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essing Officer levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on the difference of amount of TDS and tax paid by the assessee amounting to Rs. 76,674/-. 5. The assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A) but without any success. 6. Before me, the ld. AR vehemently stated that returned income and assessed income are same and, therefore, it cannot be said that any part of income was concealed, on w....