Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (3) TMI 44

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Commissioner (Appeals) being regarding the merits of the Income-tax Officer's rejection of the assessee's claim which falls within the scope of section 11(1) of the Act, the Commissioner (Appeals) should have disposed of the assessee's appeal dealing with the merits of the assessee's claim, and not with reference to the scope and applicability of section 13 of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that for purpose. of computing the chargeable profits under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the sum of Rs. 24,437 should be excluded from the total income as arrived at in the income-tax assessment, as representing 'roya....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that there is no mistake in the order to be rectified under section 13(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed. On further appeal, the Appellate Tribunal following its earlier order in STA No. 13 (MDS) of 1977-78, C-Bench of the Tribunal, order dated May 6, 1978, accepted the assessee's contention and held that the royalty payment of Rs. 24,239 was deductible as a deduction while computing the chargeable profits of the company. Learned standing counsel appearing for the Department submitted before us that the Tribunal was not correct in permitting deduction of the royalty payment while computing the chargeable profits of the company. Accordingly, learned standing counsel submitted that without the approval fr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for payment of royalty, it cannot be allowed as a deduction as per the provisions contained in section 80MM of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act also such a deduction is not possible without the approval of the Board. However, the Tribunal considering the provisions contained in rule 1(ix) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, held that the approval of the Central Board of Direct Taxes is not necessary for allowing deduction of royalty payment while computing the chargeable profits of the company, because the embargo for allowing the royalty as a deduction as placed under section 80MM of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is absent in the provisions contained in rule 1(ix) of ....