Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (10) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent year 1974-75, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Rohtak, the following question of law has been referred to this court for opinion by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in affirming the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner deleting addition of Rs. 29,601 ?" The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....avour of the assessee. It was accepted that there was a partial partition in terms of section 171 of Act with effect from April 1, 1973. The aforesaid judgment is in CIT v. Wazir Singh [1989] 179 ITR 601. In the present case, as stated above, the Income-tax Officer made an addition of Rs. 29,601 to the income of the assessee, on the basis of his earlier order passed under section 171 of the Act....