1996 (3) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stions is the expectation in these references : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to the claim for purchase tax liability ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and since the assessee had not established that there is a legal liability for purchase tax and also in view of the fact that the assessee had claimed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eduction in the context because it was prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. It is observed in the context that the assessee is not subject to purchase tax since the articles were purchased for export. It was further observed that since this aspect that the purchases were made for export was not considered by the Income-tax Officer, this was found to be erroneous. It was this question th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessee that the amount will become payable it would be liable to be allowed as business expenditure. This court has drawn strength in regard to this proposition from the decision of the Supreme Court in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 363, dealing with the factual situation that the amount was paid only later on the basis that the moment a dealer made purchases or sales ....